🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of candidates. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the process said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.